ADVANCING INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN SINGING Emotion Regulation by Maternal Speech and Singing Niusha Ghazban, Ryerson University Emotion Regulation (ER) • Caregivers play a critical role in regulating infants’ emotions • They use proximal and distal strategies to alleviate infants’ distress – – – – Distraction (Harman et al., 1997) Holding and touch (e.g., Stack & Arnold, 1998) Rocking (Ter Vrugt & Pederson, 1973) Vocalization (e.g., Jahromi et al., 2004) Parents’ ER Behaviours • Provide infants with a model of emotion regulation and positive social outcomes • Promote the development of emotional selfregulation • Focus in the present study was on maternal speech and singing, which are universally observed caregiving behaviours (Fernald & Simon, 1984; Fernald, 1991; Papousek & Papousek., 1987) Experiment 1: Singing vs. Speaking • Infants look longer at AV samples of maternal singing than speech (Nakata & Trehub, 2004). • Maternal singing modulates infants’ cortisol levels (Shenfield et al., 2003) • Infants in those studies were contented. What are the consequences of maternal speech and singing for distressed infants? Experiment 1: Singing vs. Speaking • The present study examined 10-month olds’ behavioural and physiological responses to maternal speech and singing after an acute stressor. • Provided an opportunity to examine the efficacy of maternal speech and singing in regulating infants’ negative emotions. Experiment 1: Singing vs. Speaking • Used modified version of the Face-to-Face-Still-Face Paradigm Experiment 1: Singing vs. Speaking Experiment 1: Singing vs. Speaking Experiment 1: Summary • Maternal singing was more effective than speech in regulating the emotions of distressed 10-month olds But… • North American mothers sing more play songs than lullabies • Play songs to promote infant engagement • Lullabies to promote sleep Experiment 2: Play Songs vs. Lullabies • Here we compared the relative efficacy of maternal play songs and lullabies in alleviating infants’ distress • Method: FFSF paradigm • Video Experiment 2: Play Songs vs. Lullabies Experiment 2: Play Songs vs. Lullabies Experiment 2: Summary • Maternal play songs were more effective than lullabies in regulating the emotions of distressed 10-month olds • Play songs may work by distracting infants. • They may be more familiar to these infants. Lullabies may work better in other cultures or at night-time in ours. • The rhythms of play songs may induce some kind of entrainment in infants. • Further research is necessary to clarify these issues. Thank you • • • • • • Dr. Sandra Trehub (University of Toronto) Dr. Frank Russo (Ryerson University) Dr. Jean-Paul Boudreau (Ryerson University) Sabrina Aimola Natalie Ein Support from the AIRS SSHRC MCRI [Advancing Interdisciplinary Research in Singing] - directed by Dr. Annabel J. Cohen is gratefully acknowledged